AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 6.9x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
• 9.2x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 970 vs 456
• 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 4.569
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.547 vs 115.15
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 0.373
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 7.904
• 12.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 11.055
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1131
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2112 vs 1629
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1131
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2112 vs 1629

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 705M

• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 162

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	970 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	162 455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.048 4.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	272.547 115.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.024 0.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.994 7.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.872 11.055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 1629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 1629

Compare specifications (specs)