AMD Radeon R9 M375 versus NVIDIA GeForce 705M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M375
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 40.6 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 48
- 9.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,299 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 980 versus 456
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 versus 4.569
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.547 versus 115.15
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 versus 0.373
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 versus 7.904
- 12.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 versus 11.055
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 versus 1131
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2112 versus 1629
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 versus 1131
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2112 versus 1629
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 27 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.6 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,299 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 980 versus 456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 versus 4.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 versus 115.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 versus 0.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 versus 7.904 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 versus 11.055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 versus 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 versus 1629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 versus 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 versus 1629 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 705M
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 166
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 166 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 980 | 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 166 | 455 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10054 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 | 4.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 | 115.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 | 0.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 | 7.904 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 | 11.055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | 1629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 | 1629 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Tropo | GF117 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 27 September 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1242 | 1243 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1015 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,299 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.6 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 585 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M375 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6510
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
