AMD Radeon R9 M375 versus NVIDIA GeForce 705M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M375
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 40.6 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 48
- 9.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,299 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 970 versus 456
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 versus 4.569
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.547 versus 115.15
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 versus 0.373
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 versus 7.904
- 12.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 versus 11.055
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 versus 1131
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2112 versus 1629
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 versus 1131
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2112 versus 1629
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 27 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 738 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.6 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,299 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 970 versus 456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 versus 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 versus 115.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 versus 0.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 versus 7.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 versus 11.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 versus 1629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 versus 1629 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 705M
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 162
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 970 | 456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10853 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 | 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 | 115.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 | 0.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 | 7.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 | 11.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | 1629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 | 1629 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Tropo | GF117 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 27 September 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1243 | 1244 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1015 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 738 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,299 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.6 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |