AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 226
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12565 vs 10441
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 22.828
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 vs 210.585
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 28.662
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 162.83
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 10 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 vs 10441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 vs 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 vs 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 vs 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 vs 162.83 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3069 vs 2765
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 2.618
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 3688
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2855
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 3688
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2855
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3069 vs 2765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 2.618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2765 | 3069 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | 10441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 3.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Strato | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 10 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 876 | 877 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon 540
