AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 335
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2168
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1982
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 9780 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 vs 335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1982 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39431 vs 35118
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 13 Nov 2019 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 vs 35118 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 vs 4307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9780 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 39431 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 335 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 6417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1982 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | N18P-G62 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 16 Mar 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 384 | 437 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |