AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 918 MHz
• 793.8x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 190 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 6474
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3043
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2782
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 6474
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3043
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2782

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

• Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
• 1265.4x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 3646
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 494
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.799 vs 56.81
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 vs 775.281
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.369 vs 4.602
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 vs 64.428
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 vs 257.062
• Around 54% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2778 vs 1803

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3646 6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	494 597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.602 6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 2778

Compare specifications (specs)