AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Launch date | 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26458 vs 14178
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 vs 8612
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 vs 8006
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26458 vs 14178
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 vs 8612
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 vs 8006
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 vs 8612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 vs 8006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 vs 8612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 vs 8006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13921 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66187 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 26458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 12868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 20579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 26458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 12868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 20579 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 47 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1110 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 15.97 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 124.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
IntelArc A530M
