AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 931 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,588 gflops versus 2,142 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 versus 3635
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19455 versus 11903
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 versus 24.986
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 versus 826.477
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 versus 2.362
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 versus 35.269
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 versus 55.394
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 versus 6030
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 versus 6030
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 931 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops versus 2,142 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 versus 3635 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19455 versus 11903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 versus 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 versus 826.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 versus 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 versus 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 versus 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 versus 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 versus 6030 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.26 GTexel / s versus 80.88 GTexel / s
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1280
- 3.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 versus 474
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 versus 1514
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 versus 1514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.26 GTexel / s versus 80.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 1280 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 versus 474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3657 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3657 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 | 3635 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 | 554 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19455 | 11903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | 826.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | 6030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 22 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 629 | 631 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1011 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 931 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops | 2,142 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.88 GTexel / s | 89.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 204.8 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon Pro 460
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
