AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11779
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 729
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67957 vs 39545
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 2593.621
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.975 vs 12.895
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 145.003
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 768.171
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3356
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 205.048
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13738 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2391
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13738 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2391

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12297 11779
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 729
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	67957 39545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.048 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3986.188 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.975 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.468 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1291.445 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2094 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2391 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8455 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2094 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2391 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8455 3356

Compare specifications (specs)