AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 630
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 vs 3210
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.049 vs 8.844
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 vs 171.17
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 vs 10.385
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 vs 12.361
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 988
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1702
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 2808
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 988
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1702
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 2808
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 3 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 vs 630 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 vs 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 vs 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 vs 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 vs 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 vs 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 vs 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 vs 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 vs 194 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 303
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.75
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 0.75 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Owl | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 3 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1359 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |