AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 20
- 7.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 384.0 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 versus 630
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 versus 3210
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.049 versus 8.844
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 versus 171.17
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 versus 10.385
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 versus 12.361
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 versus 988
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 versus 1702
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 versus 2808
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 versus 988
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 versus 1702
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 versus 2808
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 3 June 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 versus 630 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 versus 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 400 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 303
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.75
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.75 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Owl | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 3 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 1359 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |