AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 149
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 vs 162.594
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 12 March 2014
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 306 vs 149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156 vs 162.594

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1087 vs 890
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5620 vs 3933
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 vs 10.049
  • Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 vs 0.75
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 18.933
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 60.006
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1412
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 2111
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 3174
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1412
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 2111
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 3174
  • Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 vs 418
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1087 vs 890
Geekbench - OpenCL 5620 vs 3933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.848 vs 10.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.237 vs 0.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.15 vs 18.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.545 vs 60.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2085 vs 1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2736 vs 2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3191 vs 3174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2085 vs 1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2736 vs 2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3191 vs 3174
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 503 vs 418

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
890
1087
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
306
149
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3933
5620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.049
22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
183.156
162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.75
1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.933
21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60.006
95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
418
503
Name AMD Radeon Vega 3 NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark 890 1087
PassMark - G2D Mark 306 149
Geekbench - OpenCL 3933 5620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418 503

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 3 NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Maxwell
Code name Owl GM108
Launch date 13 February 2018 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1264 1268
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1029 MHz
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops 863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz
Shared memory 0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus