AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 149
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 vs 162.594
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 12 March 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 vs 149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 vs 162.594 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1087 vs 890
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5620 vs 3933
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 vs 10.049
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 vs 0.75
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 18.933
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 60.006
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1412
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 2111
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 3174
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1412
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 2111
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 3174
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 vs 418
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1087 vs 890 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5620 vs 3933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 vs 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 vs 0.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 vs 18.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 vs 60.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 2111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 vs 3174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 2111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 vs 3174 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 vs 418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 | 1087 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3933 | 5620 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Owl | GM108 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1264 | 1268 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |