AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 120 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 192 vs 32
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 150
- 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 27
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1140
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 1679
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1140
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 1679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 120 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 vs 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 27 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 vs 1679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 27 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 1679 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Owl | G96 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 4 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1530 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |