AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1237
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 299
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 20.323
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 29.327
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1870
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3309
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1870
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3309
• 12.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 862 vs 68

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 26.039
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 176.928
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.666

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1894 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.039 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	176.928 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.666 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.603 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.437 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	862 68

Compare specifications (specs)