AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 336

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2018 vs 3 December 2015
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	355 vs 336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 1894
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 26.039
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 176.928
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 1.666
Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 27.603
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 135.437
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 2408
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3170
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 2408
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3170

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446 vs 1894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 26.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 176.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 1.666
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 27.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896 vs 135.437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1894

3446

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

355

336

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.039

47.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

176.928

782.113

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.666

3.5

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.603

51.048

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

135.437

172.896

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3355

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894	3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	355	336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039	47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	176.928	782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666	3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603	51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437	172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	862
Geekbench - OpenCL		8148

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Maxwell
Code name	Raven	GM107
Launch date	23 April 2018	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	931	700
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Pipelines		640
Texture fill rate		43.92 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		80 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5012 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus