AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 3 December 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1098 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 versus 1894
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 versus 26.039
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 versus 176.928
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 versus 1.666
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 versus 27.603
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 versus 135.437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 versus 2408
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3170
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 versus 2408
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3170
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 versus 1894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 versus 26.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 versus 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 versus 1.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 versus 27.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 versus 135.437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 3446 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 47.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 782.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 3.5 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 51.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 172.896 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Raven | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 3 December 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 931 | 700 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.92 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
