Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6520G

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and AMD Radeon HD 6520G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 522 vs 300
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 82
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 749
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 644
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 644
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 September 2013 vs 15 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 522 vs 300
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 vs 82
Geekbench - OpenCL 2143 vs 749
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 817 vs 644
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 817 vs 644

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6520G

  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 1381
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3134 vs 3044
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 1381
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3134 vs 3044
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 20
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3134 vs 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3134 vs 3044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6520G

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
522
300
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
277
82
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2143
749
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
817
644
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1381
1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3044
3134
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
817
644
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1381
1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3044
3134
Name Intel HD Graphics 4400 AMD Radeon HD 6520G
PassMark - G3D Mark 522 300
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 82
Geekbench - OpenCL 2143 749
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 817 644
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1381 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3044 3134
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 817 644
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1381 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3044 3134
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 152

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 4400 AMD Radeon HD 6520G

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Terascale 2
Code name Haswell GT2 Llano
Launch date 3 September 2013 15 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1417 1420
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 400 MHz
Floating-point performance 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 20 320
Texture fill rate 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt
Transistor count 392 million 1000 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11
OpenGL 4.3

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync