Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and AMD Radeon HD 6520G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 522 vs 300
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 82
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 749
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 644
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 644
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 15 June 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 522 vs 300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 82 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 vs 749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 vs 644 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 vs 644 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6520G
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 1381
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3134 vs 3044
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 1381
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3134 vs 3044
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 20 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3134 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3134 vs 3044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6520G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 6520G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 522 | 300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 82 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 749 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 644 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 3134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 644 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 3134 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 6520G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | Llano |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1417 | 1420 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |