Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 354 vs 335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 11 June 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 354 vs 335 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1385
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 100 vs 95
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 1635
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 1635
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 956
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 956
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 701 vs 470
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 701 vs 470
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 18 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 1385 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 100 vs 95 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 vs 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 vs 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 vs 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 vs 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 vs 470 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1385 | 8386 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 95 | 100 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 354 | 335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | Beema |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1528 | 1542 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 930 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |