Intel HD Graphics 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 27 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 289
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 152
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2381 vs 791
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 540
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 1044
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 1702
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 540
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 1044
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 1702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 27 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 vs 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 12
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 | 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1502 | 1499 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |