Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 510

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
9.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 68
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 64
26.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 0.537
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 1117
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 1117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 15 October 2008
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	625 vs 68
PassMark - G2D Mark	163 vs 64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.381 vs 0.537
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1786 vs 1117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1786 vs 1117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

Around 93% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Core clock speed	580 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

625

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

163

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.381

0.537

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1786

1117

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1786

1117

Name	Intel HD Graphics 510	NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
PassMark - G3D Mark	625	68
PassMark - G2D Mark	163	64
Geekbench - OpenCL	2471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.381	0.537
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1786	1117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1786	1117
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 510	NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Tesla
Code name	Skylake GT1	C79MX
Launch date	1 September 2015	15 October 2008
Place in performance rating	1495	1630
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	580 MHz
Floating-point performance	182.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	12
Texture fill rate	11.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	12 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	314 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory	1
Technologies
Quick Sync