Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 4.1x better floating-point performance: 182.4 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2x 256 MB
  • 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 121
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 120
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 658
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 658
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 20 January 2009
Floating-point performance 182.4 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 2x 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 622 vs 121
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 vs 120
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1786 vs 658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1786 vs 658

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 2x 8 vs 12
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 8 vs 12

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
622
121
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
161
120
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
658
Name Intel HD Graphics 510 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark 622 121
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 120
Geekbench - OpenCL 2377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 15.094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1786 658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1786 658
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 510 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Tesla
Code name Skylake GT1 G98
Launch date 1 September 2015 20 January 2009
Place in performance rating 1502 1501
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $131.43
Price now $80.99
Value for money (0-100) 1.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 182.4 gflops 2x 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 12 2x 8
Texture fill rate 11.4 GTexel / s 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2x 256 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 2x 64 Bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 2x 11.2 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync