Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 182.4 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 121
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 120
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 658
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 658
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 20 January 2009 |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 vs 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 vs 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 vs 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2x 8 vs 12
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 8 vs 12 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 658 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | G98 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1502 | 1501 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |