Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2278
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 25 October 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2278 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1088 vs 951
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1519 vs 1462
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1088 vs 951
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1519 vs 1462
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1088 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1519 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1088 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1519 vs 1462 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4013 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2278 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Turks |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 25 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1338 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 615
