Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 M360

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R7 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 581
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 148
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 14.911
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 vs 141.079
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.927
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1280
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2460
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1280
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2460

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360

• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4769 vs 3993
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.763 vs 12.958
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 vs 28.182
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 951
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 581
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 148
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 4769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 141.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 14.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 49.774
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2460
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2460

Compare specifications (specs)