Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 24 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 vs 81
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 vs 160
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 733
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 733
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 4 December 2007 |
| Pipelines | 24 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 vs 81 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 vs 160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 733 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 867 | 81 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 733 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | G98 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 4 December 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1391 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | |
| Price now | $69.78 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
| Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
