Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 43 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 470
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 59
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2502
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2502
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 43 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 vs 470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2502 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 72 vs 24
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 3993
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 72 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 3993 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 59 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 8132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2502 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 2 February 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 1482 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 72 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 727 million |
| Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 175 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
