Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 353
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 188
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4014 vs 1345
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 2.857
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 629
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1102
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2918
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 629
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1102
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2918
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 18 February 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 vs 353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 vs 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 2.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2918 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
Core clock speed | 874 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 | 353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 | 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 2.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 2918 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF119 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1396 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 874 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |