Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 48x more pipelines: 1152 vs 24
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 864
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 209
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 3993
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 21.852
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 143.083
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 1.243
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 12.958
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 28.182
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1462
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3337
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1462
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3337
- 5.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 326
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1381 | 576 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 520 with others
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
