Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 5.7x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 9.2x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 46 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 524
  • Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 2143
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 817
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 817
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 3 September 2013
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops vs 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 693 vs 524
Geekbench - OpenCL 2443 vs 2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 20 vs 12
  • Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 155
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 464
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 845
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 464
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 845
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Pipelines 20 vs 12
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 275 vs 155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1381 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3044 vs 845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1381 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3044 vs 845

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
524
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
155
275
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2443
2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
464
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
464
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
3044
Name Intel HD Graphics 610 Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark 693 524
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 275
Geekbench - OpenCL 2443 2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 464 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 845 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 464 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 845 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.335

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 610 Intel HD Graphics 4400

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 7.5
Code name Kaby Lake GT1 Haswell GT2
Launch date 30 August 2016 3 September 2013
Place in performance rating 1531 1421
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 12 20
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 392 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync