Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 21x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 454
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 56
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 26.4 GTexel / s
- 9.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 12
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 464
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 845
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 464
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 26.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 3304 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | G92 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1531 | 1063 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 610 with others
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GT
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GS OEM
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2700M
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGRID K1
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8240
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
IntelHD Graphics 505
