Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 42.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 994
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 11 November 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 vs 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 4554
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 vs 4554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 62 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 15302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GT200B |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1313 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz |