Intel HD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 1561
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 7 February 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 1561 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- 12x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 80x more pipelines: 480 vs 6
- 40x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 464
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 193
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 470
- 162x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 8
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 464 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 | 559 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 1561 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 1296 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT1 | Thames |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 7 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1426 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 716 million |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics with others
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
