Intel HD Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
7.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 346
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 192
9.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 538

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2015 vs 14 May 2012
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	6 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	462 vs 346
PassMark - G2D Mark	193 vs 192
Geekbench - OpenCL	5315 vs 538

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 850 MHz
3.2x more texture fill rate: 4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 16 vs 6
2.2x better floating-point performance: 33.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 470
94.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 8

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines	16 vs 6
Floating-point performance	33.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754 vs 8

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

462

346

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

193

192

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5315

538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

470

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

Name	Intel HD Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	462	346
PassMark - G2D Mark	193	192
Geekbench - OpenCL	5315	538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	470	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8	754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Generation 7.0
Code name	Broadwell GT1	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	5 January 2015	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	1367	1506
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	850 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	15.6 gflops	33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	6	16
Texture fill rate	1.3 GTexel / s	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	6 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,300 million	1,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
Memory
Memory type	System Shared
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync