Intel HD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 1946
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 27 March 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 19 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 1946 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 11.7x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 192 vs 6
- 23.5x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 464
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 193
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 470
- 122.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 8
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 464 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 vs 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 vs 8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 | 623 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 212 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 1946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT1 | GK208B |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1488 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Price now | $34.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 292 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics with others
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
