Intel HD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 149
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 3866
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 3866 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 12.1x more texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
- 48.2x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 vs 464
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 470
- 198.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 8
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 vs 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 vs 8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 3866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 1589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT1 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1301 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics with others
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
