Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 935
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 338
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 5635
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1935
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1935
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 338 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 vs 5635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 1668
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 338 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 | 5635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Oland |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 993 | 896 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |