Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 935
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 338
  • Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 5635
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1935
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1935
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1978 vs 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 361 vs 338
Geekbench - OpenCL 8750 vs 5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2846 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2846 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 1668
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 1668
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 72
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2380 vs 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2380 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1978
935
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
361
338
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8750
5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2846
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1668
2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2846
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1668
2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3354
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1978 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 361 338
Geekbench - OpenCL 8750 5635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 450.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2846 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1668 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2846 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1668 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3354

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Skylake GT4e Oland
Launch date 1 September 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 993 896
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 780 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 730 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 72 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 2 GB
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync