Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 vs 31.935
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 2.344
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 vs 64.308
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3333
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 vs 1978
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 361
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11002 vs 8776
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 539.966 vs 450.087
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 vs 25.346
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1668
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 3038
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 425
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8776 11002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.145 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3333

Compare specifications (specs)