Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 993 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 264
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1973
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3289
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1973
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3289

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

• 3x more core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2605 vs 1978
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10348 vs 8750
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2188 vs 1668
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 2605
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 264
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 10348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3289
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3289

Compare specifications (specs)