Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R5 M255 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 940 MHz
• 2340.4x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2670 vs 542
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 381 vs 134
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11993 vs 4720
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.809 vs 14.288
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.453 vs 166.596
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 0.988
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 20.164
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 66.631
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1459
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1715
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1459
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1715

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M255

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2670 542
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	381 134
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11993 4720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.809 14.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.453 166.596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 0.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 20.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 66.631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357

Compare specifications (specs)