Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• 409.9x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 13x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 195 Watt
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 46.086
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 vs 989.685
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 vs 36.463
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.829 vs 99.577
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3306
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5549 vs 2687
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 354
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18433 vs 12204
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 4.596
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 5609
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2687 5549
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 533
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12204 18433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1138.276 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.596 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.742 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.829 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3306

Compare specifications (specs)