Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 9x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 vs 538

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 750 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 16 vs 12
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 318
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 92
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 5.952
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 56.77
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.427
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 5.876
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.009 vs 6.882
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1000
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1701
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1000
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 2392

Compare specifications (specs)