Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1026 versus 541
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.178 versus 7.36
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 14 May 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1026 versus 541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.178 versus 7.36 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 750 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 16 versus 12
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 345 versus 322
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 versus 94
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 7.529
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 versus 75.815
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.495
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.009 versus 11.584
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 versus 476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 1000
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1701
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 1000
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1701
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 16 versus 12 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 345 versus 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 versus 94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 7.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 versus 75.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 versus 11.584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 versus 1000 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 versus 1000 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1701 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1026 | 541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.529 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.815 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.495 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.178 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.584 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 14 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1611 | 1499 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |