Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 vs 968
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 2.566
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 56.77 vs 53.127
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 vs 4.47
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 vs 5.049
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 764
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1131
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 764
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 2 April 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 vs 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 vs 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 vs 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 vs 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 vs 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 vs 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 vs 1131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 318
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 92
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 vs 318 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 92 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1131 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF119 |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1624 | 1578 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 523 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.35 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |