Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 25 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 versus 968
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 versus 2.566
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 56.77 versus 53.127
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 versus 4.47
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 versus 5.049
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 versus 764
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 versus 1131
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 versus 764
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 versus 1131
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 2 April 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 versus 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 versus 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 versus 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 versus 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 versus 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 versus 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 versus 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 versus 1131 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 523 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 12
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 versus 318
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 versus 92
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 523 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 versus 12 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 versus 318 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 versus 92 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1131 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 2 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1578 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 523 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Performance á point flottant | 100.4 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.184 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 512 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.35 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1794 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |