Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 369 vs 248
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 vs 785
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 vs 2.342
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 vs 0.275
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 369 vs 248 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 vs 785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 vs 2.342 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 vs 0.275 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 160 vs 18
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 106
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 121.217 vs 52.728
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.14 vs 3.355
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.947 vs 4.219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 18 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 vs 52.728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.14 vs 3.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 vs 4.219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 369 | 248 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 | 785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | 2.342 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 52.728 | 121.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 | 0.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.355 | 6.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.219 | 23.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 8 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1550 | 1595 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 18 | 160 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
| Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
