Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 7x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 369 vs 248
  • Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 vs 785
  • Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 vs 2.342
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 vs 0.275
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 December 2017 vs 8 January 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 369 vs 248
Geekbench - OpenCL 1458 vs 785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.247 vs 2.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.312 vs 0.275

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM

  • 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 8.9x more pipelines: 160 vs 18
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 106
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 121.217 vs 52.728
  • Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.14 vs 3.355
  • 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.947 vs 4.219
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 160 vs 18
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 164 vs 106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 121.217 vs 52.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.14 vs 3.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.947 vs 4.219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
369
248
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
106
164
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1458
785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.247
2.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
52.728
121.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.312
0.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.355
6.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.219
23.947
Name Intel UHD Graphics 605 AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 369 248
PassMark - G2D Mark 106 164
Geekbench - OpenCL 1458 785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.247 2.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 52.728 121.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.312 0.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.355 6.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.219 23.947
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1643
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1961

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 605 AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 2
Code name Gemini Lake GT1 Caicos
Launch date 11 December 2017 8 January 2013
Place in performance rating 1550 1595
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 775 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 18 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 370 million
Floating-point performance 248.0 gflops
Texture fill rate 6.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR4 / LPDDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync