Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 314
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 150
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3242 vs 783
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 359
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1386
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 359
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 vs 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3242 vs 783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 vs 1386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 vs 1386 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 241.3x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 1772
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 1772
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 1772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 1772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3242 | 783 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | 1386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | 1386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 | 3112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Scrapper Lite |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 | July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1378 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 760 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | 194.6 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 24 | 128 |
Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | 3040 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 6080 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,303 million |
Compute units | 2 | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |