Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 314
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 150
  • 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3242 vs 783
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 359
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1386
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 359
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1386
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 November 2018 vs July 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 740 vs 314
PassMark - G2D Mark 185 vs 150
Geekbench - OpenCL 3242 vs 783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1256 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 vs 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1256 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 vs 1386

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 241.3x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 1772
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 1772
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 6080 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 128 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 vs 1772
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
740
314
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
185
150
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3242
783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1256
359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1256
359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
3112
Name Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 740 314
PassMark - G2D Mark 185 150
Geekbench - OpenCL 3242 783
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.34
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.383
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1256 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1772 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1256 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1772 3112

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 3
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Scrapper Lite
Launch date 7 November 2018 July 2013
Place in performance rating 1390 1378
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 760 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 32 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 403.2 GFLOPS 194.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 128
Pixel fill rate 3.150 GPixel/s 3040 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel/s 6080 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,303 million
Compute units 2
Render output units 4
Texture Units 8

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP

API support

DirectX 12 11.2
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3
Shared memory Yes

Technologies

Quick Sync