Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R5 M230

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
• 1473.7x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 416
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 129
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.583 vs 8.593
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 143.386
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.34 vs 0.852
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 985
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 985

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4543 vs 3242
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 12.269
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 23.383
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1720
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 1772
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1720
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	740 416
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	185 129
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 4543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.583 8.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 143.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.34 0.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 15.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.383 49.196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2401
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2401

Compare specifications (specs)