Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 893x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.6x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 153
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 168.449
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.34 vs 1.307

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1123 vs 740
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5791 vs 3242
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 vs 18.583
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 vs 12.269
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 23.383
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1256
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1720
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1772
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1256
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1720
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	740 1123
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	185 153
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 5791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.583 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.34 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.383 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3357

Compare specifications (specs)