Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 1346.2x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 30 June 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5827 vs 3303
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1313
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1313
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1461
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1461
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1677 vs 1633
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1677 vs 1633
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 238
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 921 vs 898
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5827 vs 3303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 vs 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 vs 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 238 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 921 vs 898 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3303 | 5827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 1677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 1677 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 304 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | Oland |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1218 | 1202 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
