Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 758 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 15.145
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 206.354
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.2
41.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 33.5
25.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 878 vs 33.9
37.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 60

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 31 May 2016
Core clock speed	300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 758 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062 vs 15.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504 vs 206.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777 vs 1.2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397 vs 33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878 vs 33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227 vs 60

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 4592
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 19.939
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 31.881
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1397
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 878
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2227
23.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 62

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	22612 vs 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.15 vs 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	85.46 vs 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1979 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2101 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1457 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4592

22612

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.062

15.145

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

273.504

206.354

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.777

1.2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.939

24.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.881

85.46

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

1979

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

2101

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

33.5

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

33.9

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1457

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	241
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592	22612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062	15.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504	206.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777	1.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939	24.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881	85.46
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397	1979
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878	2101
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397	33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878	33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227	60
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	62	1457

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 3.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Wani
Launch date	1 September 2017	31 May 2016
Place in performance rating	1380	1435
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	758 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	2,410 million
Floating-point performance		526.8 gflops
Texture fill rate		16.46 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	System Shared
Shared memory	1
Technologies
Quick Sync