Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2016 vs 1042
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 241
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9416 vs 4592
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2296 vs 878
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2296 vs 878
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2016 vs 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 vs 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 vs 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 vs 878 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 2016 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 341 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 9416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 638 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
