Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 630
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 3210
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 8.844
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 171.17
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.115
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 10.385
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 12.361
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 988
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 988

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 241
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 878
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2227
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 878
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2227
• 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 194

Compare specifications (specs)